Mental imagery and perceptual organization

“Filling-in” of visual perception

Visual perception is a constructive process. Previously, I studied the “filling-in” process of apparent motion.

An illustration of the paths defined by Newtonian physics (A and B) and kinematic geometry (C and D) with Pacmen-shaped objects. Black Pacmen denote examples of presented stimuli, whereas gray Pacmen denote the represented intermediate step(s). The path defined by Newtonian physics is a straight line (A and B). The paths defined by kinematic geometry are curved (C and D)[[1]]. In the case of kinematic geometry, point P is the unique center of rotation for the 90° angular difference between the Pacmen. The red paths – curved upward (C) and downward (D) – are the kinematically shorter paths compared to the dashed black paths. It is important to note that although the absolute curved arcs, defined by kinematic geometry, are longer than the length of a straight path defined by Newtonian physics, the lengths of the arcs provide the kinematically shortest paths (i.e., the shortest path as defined by the unique center of rotation), given the position and angular difference of the objects. 

[[1]] Paths defined by Newtonian physics involve a rigid body traversing a straight line between the two positions, along with rotation about its rectilinear translating center. That is, the resulting motion consists of uniform translation of the center of mass along a straight line together with simultaneous rotation of the object. Paths defined by kinematic geometry prescribe a motion in which the object is carried over a helical path by a single uniform screw motion around a center of rotation (Carlton & Shepard, 1990a).

The Pupillary Light Response as an Index of Visual Imagery: A Replication Study

This pre-registered replication study examines whether the pupillary light response (PLR) can serve as a physiological index of visual imagery. The project aims to examine findings from Kay et al. (2022), which demonstrated that imagining bright versus dark objects produces systematic changes in pupil size—even in the absence of external visual input.

Using pupillometry, we test whether participants without aphantasia show larger pupil dilation when imagining dark objects compared to bright objects. The study closely follows the original experimental procedures.

Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/U43XS
OSF Project: https://osf.io/u43xs/